Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41734213›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Financing strategies for contract agricultural supply chain considering government subsidized interest.

Jialuo Wang, Changhong Li, Yifan Shi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jialuo WangSchool of Economics and Management, Shanxi University, Taiyuan, China.
Changhong LiSchool of Economics and Management, Shanxi University, Taiyuan, China.
Yifan ShiSchool of Economics and Management, Shanxi University, Taiyuan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9306-1926

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper examines the financing strategy of capital-constrained farmers (traditional banking financing or e-commerce platform financing) and the government's subsidy strategy (whether to subsidize) in the contract agricultural supply chain. The optimal decisions, profits, and social welfare are compared and analyzed under different scenarios, and the hybrid financing model is further extended. The study found that when the probability of normal production is low, it is optimal for the farmer to choose bank financing. The farmer's choice of bank financing or platform financing is more profitable than the hybrid financing strategy in all cases. The platform can provide a short-term interest-free financing strategy to ensure the production and marketing of agricultural products. This study provides guidance on how to choose the financing strategy for the capital-constrained farmer and how the government implements subsidy policies.

Indexed as

AgricultureFinancing, GovernmentContractsFarmersGovernmentHumansModels, Economic

Identifiers

PMID41734213
PMCPMC12931798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.