Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41734197›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Automatic segmentation of coronary plaques in coronary CT angiography using neural networks.

Mahdi Moosavi, Keno Bressem, Rafael Adolf, Anastasiya Valentik, Albrecht Will, Eva Hendrich, Martin Hadamitzky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mahdi MoosaviDepartment of Cardiovascular Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, German Heart Center, TUM University Hospital, Munich, Germany.
Keno BressemDepartment of Cardiovascular Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, German Heart Center, TUM University Hospital, Munich, Germany.
Rafael AdolfDepartment of Cardiovascular Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, German Heart Center, TUM University Hospital, Munich, Germany.
Anastasiya ValentikDepartment of Cardiovascular Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, German Heart Center, TUM University Hospital, Munich, Germany.
Albrecht WillDepartment of Cardiovascular Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, German Heart Center, TUM University Hospital, Munich, Germany.
Eva HendrichDepartment of Cardiovascular Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, German Heart Center, TUM University Hospital, Munich, Germany.
Martin HadamitzkyDepartment of Cardiovascular Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, German Heart Center, TUM University Hospital, Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6267-1692

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid and accurate detection of coronary plaques on CCTA is critical for timely CAD diagnosis but is limited by reader workload and interobserver variability. Our objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of machine learning (ML) based on automated segmentation of coronary plaques in coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). We retrospectively analyzed CCTA scans from 1,642 patients (4,711 training vessels, 1,112 test vessels, plus 1,613 negative vessels) using an nnU-Net 3D full resolution architecture. Hyperparameters (batch size, learning-rate scheduler, epochs) were optimized on a 10% subset of the training dataset, and the final model was trained with 5-fold cross-validation on positive cases. Test performance was assessed at the plaque, vessel, and exam levels. Of 2,090 ground-truth plaques, the model achieved 1,772 TP for 84.8% sensitivity (95% CI 83.2-86.3%), 382 FP for 82.3% precision (95% CI 80.6-83.8), and a median Dice score of 0.88 (95% CI 0.87-0.89). At the vessel level, sensitivity was 94.7% (95% CI 93.2-95.9%) and specificity was 84.9% (95% CI 83.0-86.5%). At the examination level, sensitivity was 97.4% (95% CI 94.5-98.8%) and specificity was 79.7% (95% CI 76.5-82.6%). Detection of small, non-calcified plaques remained challenging, and false positives were often due to motion or step artifacts. Our model showed promising results in detecting coronary plaques in CCTA examinations, particularly for medium to large plaques and high negative predictive value for ruling out significant CAD, offering potential to streamline radiology workflows. Future work will focus on small-plaque detection, artifact robustness, and multi-center validation to enhance clinical utility.

Indexed as

Computed Tomography AngiographyCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseNeural Networks, ComputerPlaque, AtheroscleroticCoronary VesselsHumansMachine LearningRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID41734197
PMCPMC12931776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.