ArticlePLOS global public health2026
Patient knowledge, attitudes and practices on chronic wound infections in Tanga Regional Referral Hospital, Tanzania; A qualitative study.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Participatory Communication and Mass Dog Vaccination for Effective Rabies Management in Mitooma District, Western Uganda: An Exploratory Study.Public health challenges · 2026Article
- Prevalence and associated factors of anxiety and depression among patients with wounds: An exploratory cross-sectional study in the Taabo health and demographic surveillance system, Côte d'Ivoire.Global mental health (Cambridge, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bacterial wound infections contribute significantly to global mortality, with nearly half of contaminated wounds progressing to chronic states, which can result in amputations. In Tanzania, the situation is worsened by the misuse of antibiotics and the rise of drug-resistant bacteria, alongside patients' varied understanding of wound care management. This qualitative study explores patient knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) regarding chronic wound infections in Tanzania. A sample of 15 patients was selected from both genders, representing a wide range of ages and wound severities. Semi-structured interviews were conducted in Swahili at the Tanga Regional Referral Hospital (TRRH) from October 2023 to April 2024. Interviews used open-ended questions on dietary habits, traditional medicine, medication adherence, and wound care practices. Social demographic data were collected to contextualize patient experiences. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed via Nvivo. Thematic analysis of the interviews identified six major themes: delays in treatment-seeking, inadequate wound management, reliance on ritual practices, poor eating behaviors, challenges in coping with chronic wounds, and inadequate healthcare services. Delays stemmed from misjudging wound severity and reliance on traditional healers. Financial constraints contributed to inadequate wound management, with many patients turning to traditional remedies. Nutritious food access was limited, primarily due to financial and availability constraints. Patients faced substantial physical, emotional, and financial burdens. Long wait times and inconsistent care were also major barriers to effective wound management. Chronic wound infections are exacerbated by systemic healthcare shortcomings and limited patient education. Insights from patient perspectives emphasizes the need for proper wound management, understanding of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), and addressing cultural beliefs and resource constraints. Patient-centered models can foster more effective and sustainable models of wound care in the community setting.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.