Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41734163›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2026

Policymakers' concerns linking tobacco and Indigenous communities in India: A qualitative analysis of parliamentary questions (1952-2022).

Shilpi Sikha Das, Upendra Bhojani, Nugehalli Srinivas Prashanth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shilpi Sikha DasCentre of Adivasi Health, Institute of Public Health, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Upendra BhojaniCentre of Adivasi Health, Institute of Public Health, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9179-6248
Nugehalli Srinivas PrashanthCentre of Adivasi Health, Institute of Public Health, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tobacco use and associated disease burden remain high among Indigenous communities in India. Despite an overall decline in tobacco consumption over the last few decades, the social disparities in tobacco use have widened, with Indigenous communities experiencing the least decline. Existing tobacco control policies lack specific considerations for Indigenous communities. Hence, as part of a broader research initiative focusing on the health of Indigenous communities, we explored how parliamentarians in India have framed their concerns about tobacco in reference to Indigenous communities over time. We sourced digital transcripts of exchanges (parliamentarians asking questions and ministers responding to them) as part of the Question Hour sessions in the lower- and upper-houses of the Indian parliament between 1952 and 2022. We used thematic content analysis for 301 transcripts that linked tobacco and Indigenous communities. Overall representation of Indigenous communities in the Indian parliament remains very limited. The major concerns expressed by parliamentarians included (1) occupational health hazards and inadequate access to healthcare services faced by members from Indigenous communities working as bidi makers and tendu leaf collectors;(2) unfair wages and exploitative work conditions for these workers; and (3) perceived negative impact on tobacco-linked livelihoods resulting from trade and investment-related policies in the tobacco sector. Parliamentarians did not raise issues related to high tobacco use and tobacco-related harms among Indigenous communities in general, nor did they talk about the negative impact of tobacco on forests that are central to the lives of Indigenous communities. Public health research and advocacy efforts need to acknowledge the complex and multiple intertwining links between tobacco (industry) and Indigenous communities. There is a need to sensitise policymakers on the health and environmental impacts of tobacco while addressing the prevailing exploitation of workers from Indigenous communities in precarious tobacco supply chains and providing viable alternative livelihoods.

Identifiers

PMID41734163
PMCPMC12931741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.