ArticlePloS one2026
Banana 0.9: An open-source, reproducible medical imaging system for low-resource gastric cancer screening.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGastric cancer remains a major global health burden, particularly in East Asia, yet early-detection programs are often limited by computational constraints, variable imaging quality, and uneven resource availability across clinical settings. Existing AI models for CT analysis frequently require GPU-accelerated infrastructure and offer limited transparency or reproducibility, reducing their suitability for deployment in low-resource hospitals. To address these gaps, we developed and publicly released Banana 0.9, an open-source, CPU-based medical imaging framework intended to support fully reproducible, CT-based gastric cancer screening workflows. Banana 0.9 serves as a proof-of-concept milestone toward a broader, cross-cancer screening platform emphasizing interpretability, accessibility, and transparent methodology.
methodsBanana 0.9 was implemented as a modular, GPU-free CT imaging pipeline using deterministic Hounsfield-unit (HU) rules for organ and region-of-interest segmentation, and a fully open-source architecture for reproducibility. The system accepts DICOM, NIfTI, and ZIP inputs, and includes optional YAML-configured biomarker simulations (TriOx) and conceptual clinical risk-factor modules. These components are exploratory and intended as proof-of-concept simulations rather than validated clinical predictors. An automatic dual-audience reporting component generates structured summaries for both clinicians and patients. Internal evaluations used 10 000 Monte Carlo simulations, incorporating literature-derived Helicobacter pylori prevalence estimates and imaging statistics from the TCGA-STAD dataset. To explore potential deployment variability, experiments were conducted under simulated "urban" (higher-quality imaging, complete metadata) and "rural" (lower resolution, partial metadata) screening conditions. For external assessment, we applied the pipeline to 773 independent CT scans from the AbdomenCT-1K TumorSubset. Because this dataset lacks segmentation ground truth, the experiment was used to evaluate cross-dataset reproducibility and stability, without retraining or parameter tuning, thus reflecting reproducibility rather than accuracy assessment. An anonymized English summary of the external validation process is provided in Supplementary File S1. All source code, configuration files, and example data are publicly available to support end-to-end transparency and reproducibility.
resultsAcross 10 000 Monte Carlo simulations representing urban and rural screening conditions, Banana 0.9 produced a simulation-derived mean AUC of 0.87 (95% CI 0.84-0.90). Estimated computational demand was reduced by more than 80%, with model-based projections suggesting a ~ 60% decrease in average per-patient screening costs relative to conventional GPU-dependent workflows, an estimate based on assumptions regarding typical hardware pricing, device lifespan, and energy consumption. Simulated detection rates increased from 70% to 85% under "urban" conditions and from 65% to 80% under "rural" conditions. For external assessment, Banana 0.9 processed 773 independent CT scans from the AbdomenCT-1K TumorSubset with 100% successful execution and without retraining or parameter adjustment. Although this dataset does not provide segmentation ground truth, no instability or failure modes were observed relative to internal simulations, indicating reproducible operation across heterogeneous imaging domains.
conclusionsBanana 0.9 offers an open, transparent, and GPU-free imaging framework aimed at improving reproducibility and accessibility in gastric cancer screening workflows. Using internal Monte Carlo simulations and external execution on an independent CT dataset, the system demonstrated consistent and reproducible operation without retraining or parameter adjustment, providing preliminary evidence of stability across heterogeneous imaging conditions. While the present evaluation relies on simulated performance estimates and non-annotated external data, the modular architecture, openly available codebase, and low computational requirements position Banana 0.9 as a practical starting point for future extensions toward clinically validated, multi-cancer CT screening tools aligned with FAIR data principles and global health needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.