Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41734096›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2026

Rhythmic sampling and competition of target and distractor representations in visual sensory memory.

Sean Noah, Sreenivasan Meyyappan, Mingzhou Ding, George R Mangun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sean NoahDepartment of Neuroscience, University of California, Berkeley, 1 Barker Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9762-0430
Sreenivasan MeyyappanCenter for Mind and Brain, University of California, Davis, 267 Cousteau Place, Davis, CA 95618, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7267-5072
Mingzhou DingJ. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, 1275 Center Drive, Biomedical Science Bldg. J285, Gainesville, FL 32611, United States.
George R MangunCenter for Mind and Brain, University of California, Davis, 267 Cousteau Place, Davis, CA 95618, United States.

Funding

Mechanisms of attentional control: Structure and dynamics from simultaneous EEG-fMRI and machine learningR01MH117991 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI DING, MINGZHOU, MANGUN, GEORGE R · 2018 to 2022
$2.7M
NIH HHS NIMH R01 MH117991NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH117991
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies suggest that sustained visual attention operates rhythmically, as if the visual system periodically samples stimuli in the environment. Here, we present evidence for rhythmic sampling of internal representations of targets and distractors up to 1 s after visual stimulation offset. Twenty participants performed an anticipatory object-based visual attention task involving a short-lasting (50 ms) target object image. This task was made more challenging by the overlaid presentation of a distractor object image. We conducted a decoding analysis on stimulus-evoked electroencephalography to measure target and distractor information over the stimulus epoch, which extended almost 1,000 ms beyond the visual stimulus offset. We found that the magnitudes of target and distractor information represented in brain activity after the offset of the visual stimuli oscillated in the theta frequency range (4 to 8 Hz). This oscillatory period accords with previous characterizations of rhythmic attentional sampling of continuously visually presented stimuli. Moreover, greater target-distractor theta band phase differences correlated with improved task performance. Our findings show the following: (i) attention separately samples target and distractor representations in sensory memory, (ii) these separately sampled streams of information may mutually inhibit one another, and (iii) target discrimination improves when target and distractor sampling rhythms are desynchronized.

Indexed as

AttentionBrainMemoryVisual PerceptionAdultElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMalePeriodicityPhotic StimulationReaction TimeYoung AdultattentionbehaviordecodingEEGrhythmic sampling

Identifiers

PMID41734096
PMCPMC13370241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.