ReviewJournal of radiation research2026
Salvage stereotactic body radiotherapy for post-prostatectomy recurrence: are we almost there?
Review in Journal of radiation research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) after prostatectomy has expanded because of its radiobiological advantages and its potential to reduce treatment burden. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), an even more condensed treatment approach, has recently emerged as a possible salvage option for men with biochemical recurrence, although its role remains investigational. To summarize current evidence, we performed a narrative review of published and ongoing studies evaluating moderate HFRT and SBRT for prostate bed salvage radiotherapy, drawing from MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov through May 2025. Across the available literature, moderate HFRT using 2.5-3.0 Gy per fraction over 15-28 fractions has shown favorable tumor control with generally acceptable safety, though some studies report increased late genitourinary toxicity with higher per-fraction doses or wide treatment margins. The phase III NRG-GU003 trial demonstrated non-inferiority of HFRT compared with conventional radiotherapy using patient-reported outcomes, supporting its clinical validity. Early SBRT experiences, often using 30-34 Gy in five fractions, have shown grade ≥ 2 genitourinary toxicity in up to approximately 29% of patients, while gastrointestinal toxicity has typically remained low. However, follow-up is short, and long-term safety remains uncertain. Although conventionally fractionated salvage radiotherapy remains the standard of care, current evidence supports moderate HFRT as an accepted alternative to conventional fractionation, whereas postoperative SBRT may be feasible in selected patients. Given limited long-term safety data and the potential for late toxicities to emerge many years after treatment, SBRT should remain investigational until results from ongoing trials become available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.