ArticleATS scholar2026
One-year impact of an ambulatory pulmonary curriculum for fellows leveraging adult learning theory.
Article in ATS scholar, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn pulmonary and critical care medicine (PCCM) fellowship, inpatient training is often prioritized over outpatient learning, resulting in fellows' dissatisfaction with their ambulatory education. Additional challenges limit the use of best practices for teaching and learning in graduate medical education.
objectiveTo develop a 3-year ambulatory pulmonary curriculum leveraging principles of adult learning theory such as flipped classroom elements and interprofessional teaching, and to evaluate the first year of this curriculum.
methodsWe developed an ambulatory pulmonary curriculum at a large academic PCCM fellowship program including 24 topics over 3 years. Sessions emphasized case- and discussion-based learning in a small group setting, often incorporating flipped classroom elements. Most sessions also included interprofessional teaching for hands-on practical skill development. Assessment of the first year of the curriculum was performed using a mixed-methods approach, with pre- and postintervention surveys followed by fellow focus groups. Beginning with the third session, paired pre- and posttests for knowledge and trainee self-assessed comfort with the topic were evaluated. In-training exam (ITE) scores were compared to preintervention years.
resultsComparison of paired pre- and posttests demonstrated improved comfort in all 6 sessions, and improved knowledge in 5 of the 6 sessions assessed. ITE scores of all fellows following the first year of the curriculum were significantly increased compared to one of the 2 prior years, and ITE scores for the first-year fellows were significantly higher than both preceding academic years. Fellow and faculty surveys reflected that the curricular content, use of interprofessional teachers, small group setting, and use of presession reading all enhanced education. Fellow focus groups emphasized that content selection and teaching methodologies were strengths of the curriculum.
conclusionsIn its first year, the implementation of an ambulatory pulmonary curriculum grounded in adult learning theory and highlighting interprofessional teachers positively impacted fellow knowledge and comfort. Our curriculum is a first of its kind to demonstrate improvement in PCCM fellow knowledge and to expand the use of interprofessional teaching and flipped classroom elements to graduate ambulatory pulmonary education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.