Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41733914›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2026

Head Growth and Fundoscopy as Proxies for Intracranial Pressure in Metopic Synostosis Treated Surgically vs Conservatively.

Pauline A E Tio, Evi N Koehoorn, Lauren I F Clement, Dimitris Rizopoulos, Sjoukje E Loudon, Marie-Lise C van Veelen, Jochem K H Spoor, Sarah L Versnel, Mieke M Pleumeekers, Irene M J Mathijssen

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Pauline A E TioDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Evi N KoehoornDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Lauren I F ClementDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Dimitris RizopoulosDepartment of Biostatistics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Sjoukje E LoudonDepartment of Ophthalmology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Marie-Lise C van VeelenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Jochem K H SpoorDepartment of Neurosurgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Sarah L VersnelDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Mieke M PleumeekersDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Irene M J MathijssenDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The risk of increased intracranial pressure (ICP) in metopic synostosis remains poorly defined, leading to uncertainty about the need for routine surgical intervention vs conservative management. Objective: To compare head growth trajectories and the prevalence of signs of increased ICP among patients with metopic synostosis managed surgically or conservatively. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective cohort study included all 209 new patients with single-suture metopic synostosis presenting to Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2024. The current analysis included data collection up to July 31, 2025. Patients underwent annual follow-up with head circumference measurement and fundoscopy. Intervention: Surgical or conservative management of metopic synostosis determined through shared decision-making between clinicians and parents. Main Outcome and Measures: The primary outcome was longitudinal head circumference standard deviation (SD), analyzed using linear mixed models. Secondary outcomes were head growth deflection and papilledema, understood as signs of increased ICP, detected on fundoscopy. Results: Among 209 patients (78 surgical and 131 conservative; median age at presentation, 4 months [IQR, 2-7 months]; 154 boys [74%]), the median age at last follow-up was 40 months (IQR, 24-61 months). Head circumference SD increased significantly with age in a nonlinear pattern (age spline df = 1; β = 0.87; 95% CI, 0.54-1.21; P < .001; and age spline df = 2; β = 0.73; 95% CI, 0.29-1.16; P < .001). Female sex was associated with higher SD (β = 0.31; 95% CI, 0.03-0.60; P = .03). Surgical treatment was associated with higher initial SD but a significantly flatter growth trajectory over time compared with conservative treatment (β = -1.02; 95% CI, -1.52 to -0.52; P < .001 for interaction age spline and treatment). Severe deformity phenotype was associated with lower SD values compared with mild deformity phenotype (β = -0.39; 95% CI, -0.75 to -0.04; P = .03). Among 158 patients with 2 or more years of follow-up, head growth deflection occurred among 3 patients (1.9%): 2 of 65 (3.1%) in the surgical group and 1 of 93 (1.1%) in the conservative group (P = .57). Papilledema was observed in 3 patients (1.4%): 2 of 78 (2.6%) in the surgical group and 1 of 131 (0.8%) in the conservative group (P = .56). None of these patients required additional surgery. Conclusions and Relevance: In this prospective cohort of patients with metopic synostosis, signs of elevated ICP were rare and did not differ between surgical and conservative groups. Although surgery altered head growth trajectories, the low prevalence of ICP-related findings supports close monitoring and selective surgical intervention as safe alternatives to routine surgery.

Indexed as

Conservative TreatmentCraniosynostosesHeadIntracranial HypertensionIntracranial PressureChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantMaleNetherlandsProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID41733914
PMCPMC12933276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.