Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41733913›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2026

Morphine Plus Placebo vs Morphine Plus Acetaminophen for Acute Pain in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Guillaume Cattin, Damien Viglino, Julien Segard, Christelle Volteau, Anthony Chauvin, Michel Galinski, Olivier Maigre, Alix Delamare-Fauvel, Marion Le Pottier, Valerie Debierre and 5 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter StudyEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04148495 (Intravenous Acetaminophen and Morphine Versus Intravenous Morphine Alone for Acute Pain in the Emergency Department), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04148495 phase4completednot on this map

Intravenous Acetaminophen and Morphine Versus Intravenous Morphine Alone for Acute Pain in the Emergency Department: a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Double-blind Non-inferiority Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorNantes University HospitalRan2019 to 2024Enrolled415ConditionsPain ManagementArmsplacebo of acetaminophen IV, acetaminophen IV
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Guillaume CattinService des Urgences, Nantes Université, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Nantes, Nantes, France.
Damien ViglinoEmergency Department and HP2 Laboratory INSERM U1800, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.
Julien SegardService des Urgences, Centre Hospitalier Saint Nazaire, Nantes, France.
Christelle VolteauCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Nantes, Research and Innovation Direction, Methodology and Biostatistics Platform, Nantes University, Nantes, France.
Anthony ChauvinAssistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Lariboisière, Service d'Accueil des Urgences et Service Mobile d'Urgence et de Réanimation, Paris, France.
Michel GalinskiService d'Aide Médicale Urgente, Hôpital Pellegrin, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Bordeaux Cedex, France.
Olivier MaigreService des Urgences, Centre Hospitalier Lorient, Nantes, France.
Alix Delamare-FauvelEmergency Department, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France.
Marion Le PottierDépartement de Médecine d'Urgences, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Angers, Angers, France.
Valerie DebierreService d'Urgences, Centre Hospitalier La Roche sur Yon, La Roche sur Yon, France.
Tahar ChouihedService d'Urgences, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nancy, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France.
Céline LongoService des Urgences, Nantes Université, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Nantes, Nantes, France.
Joël JenvrinService des Urgences, Nantes Université, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Nantes, Nantes, France.
Yonathan FreundEmergency Department, Hôpital Pitie-Salpêtrière, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Emmanuel MontassierService des Urgences, Nantes Université, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Nantes, Nantes, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Intravenous (IV) acetaminophen is widely used in multimodal analgesia with opioids for the initial management of acute pain in emergency departments (EDs), but its additive benefit when combined with titrated morphine is uncertain. Objective: To determine whether titrated IV morphine plus placebo is noninferior to titrated IV morphine plus acetaminophen for pain relief in the first hour in adults seen in the ED with acute traumatic or nontraumatic pain. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled noninferiority clinical trial was conducted in 11 French EDs from December 3, 2019, to December 31, 2024, with 60 minutes of follow-up. Adults (aged ≥18 years) with severe acute pain (numeric rating scale [NRS] score ≥5 on a scale from 0 [no pain] to 10 [worst pain]) of traumatic or nontraumatic origin were eligible. Prespecified analyses were planned for traumatic and nontraumatic pain. Interventions: All patients received weight-based titrated IV morphine. In the control group, patients also received 1 g IV acetaminophen; in the intervention group, patients received matching placebo. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the mean change in NRS pain score from baseline to 30 minutes. The noninferiority margin was 1 point. Analyses were conducted in modified intention-to-treat (mITT) and per-protocol (PP) populations. Results: Among 430 randomized patients (median age, 42 years [IQR, 29-57 years]; 220 men [51.2%]), 424 were included in the mITT analysis (213 in the morphine plus placebo and 211 in the morphine plus acetaminophen group; 181 [42.7%] had traumatic pain and 243 [57.3%] had nontraumatic pain) and 393 were included in the PP analysis (197 morphine plus placebo and 196 morphine plus acetaminophen; 169 [43.0%] had traumatic pain and 224 [57.0%] had nontraumatic pain). In the PP analysis, the between-group difference in mean pain score reduction was 0.32 points (95% CI, -0.29 to 0.94 points) for traumatic pain and 0.80 points (95% CI, 0.19-1.41 points) for nontraumatic pain. In the mITT analysis, the corresponding differences were 0.36 points (95% CI, -0.28 to 1.01 points) and 0.76 points (95% CI, 0.11-1.41 points). In both strata, pain reduction favored the acetaminophen group, but the differences did not meet the prespecified noninferiority margin of 1 point. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial of adults seen in the ED with acute pain, morphine plus placebo did not meet the criterion for noninferiority compared with morphine plus acetaminophen for pain relief during the initial management. The findings suggest acetaminophen may have potential benefit as an adjunct to morphine in individualized treatment approaches for acute pain in the ED. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04148495.

Indexed as

AcetaminophenAcute PainAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticAnalgesics, OpioidMorphinePain ManagementAdultDouble-Blind MethodDrug Therapy, CombinationEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleFranceHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementAcetaminophenAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticAnalgesics, OpioidMorphine

Identifiers

PMID41733913
PMCPMC12933283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.