ArticleBioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy2026
Navigating the Transition: A Scoping Review of System-Level Factors in Biosimilar Integration for Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases.
Article in BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Navigating the Transition: A Scoping Review of System-Level Factors in Biosimilar Integration for Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases are routinely transitioned from originator biologics to biosimilars to reduce healthcare costs. While barriers related to patient and practitioner beliefs and knowledge are well-documented, less focus has been placed on system-level factors that may hinder biosimilar uptake.
aimsThis review aims to identify system-level factors that impact biosimilar brand transitions for treatment of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, as reported by key stakeholders involved in real-world brand changes.
methodsA scoping review was conducted following the Arksey and O'Malley framework and was reported in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR). A comprehensive search was performed in APA PsycInfo, Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, and databases for major conferences in rheumatology, dermatology, and gastroenterology. Data from relevant studies were extracted and summarized onto a structured coding sheet before being synthesized.
resultsOf 2301 articles screened, 47 journal articles and five conference abstracts were included. Most studies were conducted in the United States and focused primarily on rheumatology. Barriers and facilitators were organized into four overarching themes. These were regulatory and approval processes (e.g., tendering practices, interchangeability policies, prescriber guidelines), healthcare system policies and incentives (including quotas, insurance coverage, reimbursement mechanisms, and rebates), infrastructure and logistics (such as supply chain considerations and storage requirements), and communication and education (including media and expert influence and the involvement of patient organizations).
conclusionsMultiple components of the healthcare system play a role in successful biosimilar transitions. Leveraging regulations, policies, infrastructure, and communication before, during, and after transition offers a practical blueprint for managing brand changes across health systems and therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.