ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2026
Immediate spermatogenesis assessment after testicular tissue retrieval for azoospermic males using touch print smear.
Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTouch print smear (TPS) of testicular specimens provides immediate diagnostic results comparable to histopathology and in vitro fertilization laboratory findings. This study aimed to validate TPS as a rapid complement to histopathology for detecting post-meiotic germ cells in azoospermic patients. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 495 azoospermic patients (274 with obstructive azoospermia [OA]) who underwent testis needle biopsy (2015-2022). Specimens were immediately smeared onto sterile slides, then transferred into Bouin's solution for pathological diagnosis. Slides were stained with thionine and examined under light microscopy. Spermatogenesis development was compared between TPS findings and histopathology.
resultsTPS and histopathology were concordant in 98.2% (269/274) of OA and 75.6% (167/221) of non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) cases. Among discordant NOA patients, 74.1% (40/54) showed more advanced spermatogenesis with TPS. Of 20 patients in whom post-meiotic germ cells were identified by TPS but not by histopathology, 95% (19/20) achieved successful sperm retrieval during subsequent microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE). Conversely, in NOA patients where TPS suggested less advanced spermatogenesis and failed to identify post-meiotic germ cells, the sperm retrieval rate was 57.1% (4/7).
conclusionTPS allows rapid identification of post-meiotic germ cells with excellent concordance in OA and provides clinically relevant information in NOA. Patients in whom TPS demonstrates post-meiotic germ cells have a high likelihood of sperm retrieval, whereas their absence on TPS indicates lower retrieval success, in which case histopathology remains a useful backup.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.