ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2026
Scoping review of apixaban and rivaroxaban dosing for atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism in advanced chronic kidney disease.
Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIndividuals with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) have elevated risks for stroke, venous thromboembolism (VTE), and bleeding, yet their exclusion from major trials leaves uncertainty about dosing of apixaban and rivaroxaban.
aimTo map existing evidence on apixaban and rivaroxaban dosing practices and associated clinical outcomes in patients with advanced CKD, predominantly not receiving dialysis, treated for atrial fibrillation (AF) and/or venous thromboembolism (VTE), and to identify knowledge gaps in this area.
methodA scoping review was conducted following the Arksey and O'Malley framework and reported per PRISMA-ScR guidelines. The search, developed with a medical librarian, was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and CINAHL through May 7, 2025. Duplicates were removed, and records managed in Covidence. Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full texts. We included studies of apixaban or rivaroxaban dosing in adults with advanced CKD (mostly non-dialysis) with AF or VTE reporting thromboembolic or major bleeding outcomes. Non-English articles and publication types (e.g., abstracts, case series, editorials) were excluded. Data was extracted using a structured form and summarized to address the study aim.
resultsThirty-four studies were identified: seven VTE, six combined AF/VTE, and 21 AF. Standard-dose apixaban and rivaroxaban were more commonly used and associated with lower, though non-significant, rates of recurrent VTE and major bleeding compared to warfarin. In apixaban groups, standard-dose 5 mg BID had fewer VTE events than the 2.5 mg BID dose but more major bleeding events which were also not statistically significant. In AF studies, both standard and reduced-dose apixaban (5 mg BID and 2.5 mg BID), and reduced-dose rivaroxaban (15 mg daily), significantly reduced major bleeding risk versus warfarin. Stroke reductions were not consistently significant but trended lower with apixaban and rivaroxaban compared to warfarin. In the only AF study comparing apixaban and rivaroxaban, both doses of rivaroxaban (20 mg or 15 mg daily) had higher bleeding rates than apixaban. One of four AF studies showed higher bleeding with standard versus reduced-dose apixaban.
conclusionThis review summarizes apixaban and rivaroxaban dosing for AF/VTE in advanced CKD, revealing gaps such as limited dose-comparison studies, heterogeneous outcomes and sparse data in non-dialysis. Robust trials are urgently needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.