ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2026
Cardiac neural representations for ECG-guided slice-to-volume reconstruction.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cardiac 3D cine MRI is constrained by long acquisition times and challenging motion-handling requirements. As a result, certain patient conditions, such as cardiac arrhythmias, prevent the use of 3D sequences for whole-heart assessments. For these patients, 2D real-time sequences offer an alternative imaging solution, as they enable artifact-free acquisitions of individual slices with good in-plane contrast and temporal resolution. To derive whole-heart reconstructions from multi-planar 2D real-time MRI, we propose CiNeVol, a dynamic implicit neural representation network adapted from the static NeSVoR model. CiNeVol takes ECG- and respiration belt-derived motion states as inputs and provides decoupled estimates of cardiac and respiratory motion, yielding spatiotemporally consistent 3D reconstructions at arbitrary motion states. As lightweight in architecture, the model allows for fast instance optimization without requiring high-resolution training data. Evaluated on a simulated MRI dataset, CiNeVol demonstrates competitive image quality for both free-breathing (SSIM=0.92, PSNR=28.83, NMSE=0.03) and breath-hold (SSIM=0.89, PSNR=27.81, NMSE=0.04) 3D cine reconstructions, with faster runtimes than NeSVoR (SSIM=0.88, PSNR=26.13, NMSE=0.05) and SVRTK (SSIM=0.86, PSNR=26.28, NMSE=0.05). Preliminary in-vivo evaluations on three healthy volunteers confirm good spatiotemporal coherence, as reflected by superior expert scores, although remaining limitations, such as underestimation of cardiac contraction and image blurring, suggest the need for further optimization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41733859What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.