ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2026
Electromyographic features for quantitative assessment of lower limb spasticity after stroke: a feasibility study.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Assessment of lower limb spasticity is crucial for enhancing both functional recovery and rehabilitation effectiveness of stroke patients. Traditional methods like the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) are often hampered by subjective bias, leading to inconsistent assessments among clinicians. In contrast, neurophysiological methods, mainly surface Electromyography (sEMG) data analysis, offer a more objective and sensitive alternative. Most of the existing studies based on sEMG focus more on upper limb applications, while research on the assessment of lower limb spasms is still under exploration. In this study, a feasibility investigation was conducted to explore the quantitative assessment of post-stroke lower limb spasticity based on sEMG features. The research aimed to elucidate the potential association between spasticity severity and sEMG features through sEMG analysis. Eleven participants with stroke were recruited and stratified into three MAS levels. Lower limb muscle activity was recorded using sEMG sensors during spasticity assessments performed at three stretching velocities (slow, medium, and fast). sEMG features were extracted to systematically analyze correlations with spasticity grades, following which appropriate features were selected. Machine learning algorithms were subsequently employed to validate the feasibility of sEMG-based quantification for lower limb spasticity classification. Experimental results demonstrated the classification accuracy of 86.17% and the F1-score of 86.17% in spasticity evaluation utilizing sEMG features. This study provides a new research idea for the relationship between sEMG-derived features and spasticity grading, while enhancing the mechanistic understanding of sEMG features contributions to spasticity pathophysiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41733858What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.