ArticleGeroScience2026
Genome-wide association study of frailty and integrative functional analysis to elucidate its relationship with aging.
Article in GeroScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Frailty is a clinically recognizable condition of vulnerability with aging, leading to adverse health outcomes. Previous GWASs on frailty have identified 59 susceptibility loci, although the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. We investigated the genetic determinants of frailty and biological relationship between frailty and aging genes in 14,664 middle-aged and elderly Korean participants. We performed cohort-based (KoGES and KNHANES) meta-analysis of GWAS and candidate gene approach focusing on the aging pathway, followed by functional analyses. Frailty was defined as three phenotypes based on the FRAIL scale, CHS index, and frailty index. A meta-analysis of the GWAS on frailty identified eight novel SNPs: rs73619247 (AKAP12), rs12672085 (SUGCT), rs10881815 (SH2D4B), rs1455725, rs118100642 (BANK1), rs141617066, rs10461403, and rs10499589 at suggestive significance of P < 1.00 × 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
41733842What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.