Article3D printing in medicine2026
Teaching punch biopsy and suturing with a 3D-printed skin model: design and integration into the medical curriculum.
Article in 3D printing in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn the 2019/2020 winter semester, the University of Augsburg’s Faculty of Medicine introduced a competence-oriented model degree program with a spiral curriculum integrating theory and practice. A key feature, the clinical longitudinal course, emphasizes practical skills such as skin examination. Existing training materials for punch biopsies, e.g., foam models and fruit, have proven insufficient. This project aimed to create a realistic, cost-effective, reusable three-dimensional (3D) skin model to improve the teaching of punch biopsy and suturing techniques.
methodsThe 3D skin model was developed in a multistage process. It began with a 3D scan created via a handheld 3D scanner and refined in 3D modeling software. A fused deposition modeling (FDM) printer produced negative molds that were filled with silicone, resulting in a realistic model. After several iterations, a design was achieved that successfully simulated the tactile and functional aspects of punch biopsy and skin suturing. Student feedback was collected through an anonymous online questionnaire assessing perceived realism, usefulness for practicing punch biopsies and suturing, and impact on their confidence.
resultsThe silicone-based skin simulator debuted in the 2023–2024 winter semester’s ‘examination of the skin’ course. A total of 82 students participated in the course, of whom 58 completed the evaluation questionnaire. The students used the model to perform punch biopsies and suturing, reporting that its material properties allowed these procedures to be practiced under course conditions. With a low production cost (of 0.62 € per model) compared to commercial models, it is a cost-efficient alternative to previous materials. The students provided positive feedback, reporting increased confidence in performing these procedures on humans for the first time.
conclusionsThe 3D training model is an important advancement in introducing 3D technologies in practical training, providing realistic, cost-effective practice for punch biopsy and suturing. Its successful integration into the curriculum highlights its potential for broader applications in medical education. The evaluation indicated that the model provided realistic skin properties and proved effective for practicing punch biopsies and suturing, thus addressing the limitations of traditional training materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.