ArticleTherapeutic innovation & regulatory science2026
A Survey on the Implementation of Analytical Quality by Design in Method Development in the Pharmaceutical Industries of Southeast Brazil: Challenges and Opportunities.
Article in Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Analytical Quality by Design (AQbD) is a systematic approach that integrates quality into method design, ensuring robustness, fitness for purpose, and consistency throughout the lifecycle. This study aimed to assess the current scenario, benefits, and challenges of implementing AQbD in analytical method development within the pharmaceutical industry. The methodology included a questionnaire survey applied to pharmaceutical companies, complemented by insights from the literature to contextualize regulatory and scientific challenges. While AQbD offers a promising approach for developing robust methods, its full adoption faces technical, operational, and regulatory barriers. The survey found that although 88.3% of the responding companies are familiar with AQbD, only 50% have begun implementation, mainly in early stages with a focus on tools like design of experiments and risk assessment. Key AQbD components remain underutilized. The main barriers to implementation include a lack of technical resources, qualified personnel, cultural resistance, and unclear regulatory requirements. The literature indicates that AQbD has been widely applied. However, methodological inconsistencies persist. The comparative analysis revealed the alignment between literature and practice regarding benefits but also highlighted gaps in AQbD implementation. By identifying the specific challenges faced by regulated sectors, this study provides valuable insights for regulatory agencies to anticipate future needs, refine guidelines, and promote harmonized standards that ultimately strengthen analytical method quality and ensure consistent product quality throughout the lifecycle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.