ArticleOral radiology2026
Caries imaging using T1 StarVIBE and PETRA sequences compared to normal dental work-up: a proof-of-concept study.
Article in Oral radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact of sequence selection on postoperative MRI interpretability and artifact reduction in simulated mandibular trauma.Frontiers in oral health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo compare caries detection using T1-based Free-breathing 3D Stack of Stars GRE (StarVIBE) and T1-weighted pointwise encoding time reduction with radial acquisition (PETRA) MRI sequences with the gold standard consisting of a combination of clinical evaluation and bitewing radiography. MATERIALS AND
methodsIncluded subjects were evaluated clinically by a dentist for the occurrence of caries. All subjects underwent bitewing radiographs and MRI of the viscerocranium, including 3D StarVIBE and 3D PETRA sequences. Caries lesions were evaluated for penetration depth (D1-D4). Signal intensity (SI) was measured in dental hard tissue, the pulp and caries lesions.
results80 teeth were analyzed. Among these, 10 showed caries during clinical assessments and bitewing imaging, all of which were also detected on MRI. Furthermore, 5 additional lesions were identified exclusively on MRI. Overall image quality and diagnostic confidence were significantly higher in PETRA than in StarVIBE (4.7 vs. 3.9, p = 0.006). The SI for caries lesions was significantly higher in the PETRA sequence (-0.5 a.u. ± 1.5 a.u. vs. -4.2 a.u. ± 4.0 a.u., p = 0.002). Caries lesion volume was also significantly larger in PETRA (18 mm
Indexed as
Identifiers
41733774What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.