Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41733773›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026

In-hospital moderate intensity interval training following surgical resection of foregut malignancy - a prospective single arm feasibility study.

Michael W Hii, Rosalind Walmsley, Qianyu Chen, Lynn Chong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael W HiiDepartment of Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. michael.hii@svha.org.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1313-0499
Rosalind WalmsleyDepartment of Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7473-0757
Qianyu ChenDepartment Upper GI and HPB Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, 41 Victoria Pde, Fitzroy, 3065, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4098-5735
Lynn ChongDepartment of Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2595-958X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurgical resections of foregut malignancy are generally procedures with substantial morbidity and mortality. The use of exercise therapy has resulted in improvements in outcomes in many parts of the cancer treatment pathway and thus has become a standard addition to oncology and surgical oncology paradigms including during chemotherapy and as prehabilitation and rehabilitation for surgery. Guided in-hospital interval training as post-surgical therapy has not been evaluated as a treatment tool. If safe and acceptable to patients, this has the potential to improve surgical outcomes.

methodsTwenty-one subjects were enrolled in a prospective single-arm trial of guided in-hospital, immediately postoperative moderate- (+) intensity interval training while recovering from a resection of foregut malignancy. A specific exercise program was designed for the postoperative setting and administered, aimed at achieving maximal intensity training during surgical recovery in the hospital environment. We hypothesized that this intervention would be safe, acceptable to patients, and would not negatively influence health-related quality of life. This was assessed by compliance with exercise sessions, the incidence of training-related complications, and the EORTC QLQ-30 and Hospital Anxiety and Depression scores.

resultsTwenty-one patients were enrolled in this study (7 esophagectomies, 10 laparotomies, 4 laparoscopies). Participation in the program was high with 90.5% of subjects completing greater than 25% of all possible sessions and 71.4% of patients completing greater than 50% of possible sessions. There was no intervention-related adverse event. There was no reduction in emotional quality of life measures on discharge.

conclusionsAdministering a postoperative moderate- (+) intensity interval training program following recovery from major foregut surgery is acceptable to patients with high rates of participation. It is safe and does not result in a reduction in emotional health related quality of life.

Indexed as

Exercise TherapyAdultAgedAnxietyDepressionEsophagectomyFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansLaparoscopyLaparotomyMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesQuality of LifeEsophagectomyForegutGastrectomyHepatectomyInterval training

Identifiers

PMID41733773
PMCPMC12932401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.