ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026
Evaluating Japan's cancer control activities: Findings from the third cancer patient experience survey.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeIn this study, we assessed patient experiences with cancer care in Japan as part of the national evaluation of the National Cancer Control Plan. We aimed to identify strengths and gaps in cancer care delivery across patient groups, including those with rare cancers and individuals aged < 40 years, to inform future policy development.
methodsWe conducted a nationwide cross-sectional survey between December 2023 and March 2024 using a self-administered mail questionnaire. Eligible participants were selected from the national database of Hospital-Based Cancer Registries using a two-stage stratified random sampling method. Among the 32,716 individuals invited, 11,247 eligible responses were analyzed. Sampling weights were applied to ensure national representativeness. Outcomes included overall ratings of care, information provision, access to care, symptom burden, psychosocial support, and socioeconomic issues.
resultsPatients rated the care they received highly (mean score = 8.2/10); however, notable gaps were identified. Only 55.0% of respondents were aware of the Cancer Counseling and Support Centers, and merely 15.4% were informed about peer support. Patients with rare cancers and those aged < 40 years faced delayed diagnosis, greater difficulty accessing care, and heavier psychosocial and financial burdens. Younger patients were more likely to report emotional distress and unmet informational needs regarding work-related issues than older patients.
conclusionCancer care in Japan is generally well-received; however, significant challenges remain, particularly for younger patients and those with rare cancers. Increasing support service awareness and utilization, along with improved access pathways and targeted support for adolescent and young adult patients, are essential to promoting equitable and patient-centered cancer care under the revised Cancer Control Plan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.