ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2026
Biomechanical comparison of radiopalmar double plating with conventional palmar plating in comminuted distal radius fractures.
Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of distal screw number on axial deformation and fragment-specific stability in AO/OTA 2R3 C2.1 distal radius fractures.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2026Article
- Impact of modified Henry approach with preservation of Flexor Carpi Radialis Tendon Sheath on wrist function in the treatment of distal radius fractures.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2026Article
- Biomechanical comparison of palmar plate plus headless compression screw versus radiopalmar double plating in AO/OTA 23-C2.1 distal radius fractures.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this study is to analyse the effect of an additional radial buttress plate for palmar plate osteosynthesis in an AO/OTA 2R3 C2.1 fracture model.
methodsNine pairs of freshly frozen radii were analysed for pathology and bone mineral density and divided into two matched groups. One group was treated with a variable-angle palmar locking plate alone, while the second group received an additional radial buttress plate for radiopalmar double plating. An AO/OTA 2R3 C2.1 fracture was created in all specimens. The biomechanical tests were performed according to previously published protocols. Stiffness, axial displacement of the construct, as well as fragment-specific movements and rotations were assessed.
resultsNo implant failure was observed. In the total cohort, stiffness increased (p < 0.01) and axial construct displacement decreased (p < 0.05). The mobility of the ulnar fragment to the shaft during cyclic testing was lower with double plating, both at baseline and endpoint (all p < 0.01). Fragment movements increased over the course of testing and were significant for the radial articular fragment relative to the shaft in the total cohort (p < 0.01). Baseline rotation of the ulnar fragment and endpoint rotation of the radial fragment in relation to the shaft were lower with double plating (all p < 0.05). In both constructs, the rotation of the ulnar fragment relative to the shaft was lower than that of the radial fragment at both timepoints (all p < 0.05).
conclusionBiomechanically, the addition of a radial buttress plate to a standard palmar locking plate did not alter global construct stiffness, but demonstrated advantages in fragment-specific stability in comminuted distal radius fractures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.