ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2026
D-Dimer levels during pregnancy and postpartum: non-applicability of regularly used cut-offs for diagnosis of suspected pulmonary embolism.
Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical factors associated with recurrent pregnancy loss status in women with polyendocrine metabolic ovarian syndrome.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo assess D-dimer levels during pregnancy and postpartum period and evaluate the appropriateness of commonly used cut-offs for ruling out pulmonary embolism (PE) in this population.
methodsSecondary analysis of the prospective PPH 1300 study conducted at the University Hospital Zurich, including 1309 women between 25 + 0 and 42 + 3 weeks of gestation without acute thromboembolic events. D-Dimer levels were measured at admission for delivery and 24-48 h postpartum, stratified into four gestational age groups.
resultsMedian D-dimer values were 1.56 mg/L (IQR 1.20-2.12) antepartum and 1.78 mg/L (IQR 1.25-2.84) postpartum. Antepartum, 99.3% of women had levels ≥ 0.5 mg/L and 88.8% ≥ 1.0 mg/L; postpartum, 98.8% and 88.1% exceeded these cut-offs, respectively. Antepartum values showed an increasing trend with gestational age, whereas postpartum values remained uniformly elevated. No clinically relevant thromboembolic events occurred during the index hospitalization.
conclusionsNearly all pregnant and postpartum women exceed conventional D-dimer thresholds also in the absence of thromboembolism. Standard cut-offs of 0.5 and 1.0 mg/L are therefore unsuitable in obstetric practice, limiting the applicability of general diagnostic algorithms, such as YEARS and Geneva, unless specifically adapted. Trimester- and postpartum-adjusted thresholds or alternative biomarkers are needed to reduce unnecessary imaging and improve clinical management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.