ArticlePsychological research2026
Spatial representation of serial order in working memory: a cross-cultural comparison between Japanese and Italian adults.
Article in Psychological research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The spontaneous spatialization of serial order in working memory (WM), often reflected by the SPoARC effect, is thought to be influenced by reading/writing habits. However, cross-cultural research comparing the direction of spatial organization in WM remains limited. Here we investigated the spontaneity of this spatialization (its independence from visual-spatial prompts) and its generalizability across different cultural reading systems (Italian vs. Japanese) and spatial axes using a modified SPoARC procedure where visual stimuli are replaced with auditory sequences during encoding, while participants provided manual responses along horizontal (Experiment 1, N = 57) and radial (Experiment 2, N = 49) axes. We predicted a horizontal left-to-right effect in Italians, a potentially different or absent effect in Japanese due to their mixed reading-writing system, and a top-to-bottom radial SPoARC effect in both groups, considering shared downward information flow experiences. Results confirmed an early-left/late-right horizontal SPoARC effect in Italian readers, which extended, albeit significantly smaller, to Japanese readers. In contrast, no reliable radial spatial bias emerged in either group. These findings are consistent with the view, supported by developmental research, that spatial-order associations emerge from the interaction between early maturational constraints on right hemisphere recruitment for visuo-spatial attention and sensorimotor experience from reading/writing habits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.