ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2026
Sparse testcrossing for early-stage genomic prediction of general combining ability to increase genetic gain in maize hybrid breeding programs.
Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Efficiency of indirect selection in sorghum breeding for target production environments in moisture deficit areas of Ethiopia.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
key messageSparse testcrossing with 3-5 testers enhances genetic gain in hybrid breeding programs, offering a practical balance of simple testcross designs, resource efficiency, and increased prediction accuracy for general combining ability. Sparse testcrossing is an effective strategy for increasing both short- and long-term genetic gain in hybrid breeding programs. Maize hybrid breeding programs aim to develop new hybrid varieties by crossing genetically distinct parents from different heterotic pools, exploiting heterosis for improved performance. The programs typically consist of two main components: population improvement and product development. The population improvement component aims to enhance the heterotic pools through reciprocal recurrent selection based on general combining ability (GCA). However, especially in the early stages of testing, evaluating large numbers of hybrid combinations to estimate GCA is impractical due to considerable logistical challenges and costs. Therefore, breeders often evaluate the initial population of selection candidates using only a single tester to narrow down the candidate pool before further evaluation. Using a single tester, however, may not adequately represent the heterotic pool, leading to inaccurate GCA estimates and suboptimal selection decisions. To address this, we propose sparse testcrossing for early-stage testing, where subsets of candidate genotypes are testcrossed with different testers, connected through a genomic relationship matrix. We conducted stochastic simulations to compare various sparse testcrossing designs with a conventional testcross strategy using a single tester over 15 cycles of reciprocal recurrent genomic selection. Our results show that using 3-5 testers, sparsely distributed among full-sibs, sparse testcrossing offers breeders a practical balance between simple testcross designs, resource efficiency, and increased prediction accuracy for GCA, ultimately resulting in increased rates of genetic gain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.