ArticleEuropean radiology2026
Diagnostic accuracy of deep learning vs. human raters for detecting osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures in routine CT scans.
Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesVertebral fractures are severe complications of osteoporosis but are frequently missed on computed tomography (CT). Differentiating true fractures from non-osteoporotic vertebral height loss remains challenging; deep learning (DL) models may improve detection and grading. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this retrospective study, we evaluated eight human raters with different expertise (three students, three residents, and two attendings), four DL models, and one DL-based commercial software using the public Vertebral Segmentation (VerSe) 19 & 20 datasets. Vertebral fractures were graded using the semiquantitative Genant scale (0-3). Diagnostic performance was evaluated using interrater agreement and classification metrics, with significance tested via generalized linear mixed models across patient and vertebral levels for the thoracolumbar spine and its regional subsets. Consensus readings by a senior neuroradiologist and an experienced resident, informed by clinical data, served as the reference standard.
results3548 thoracic and lumbar vertebrae from 331 patients were analyzed. 190 (5.4%) of vertebrae were fractured, and 139 (3.9%) had "clinically most relevant" moderate or severe fractures (Genant 2 or 3). DL models showed comparable accuracy as residents in detecting moderate/severe fractures (0.988 vs. 0.991, p > 0.05) on vetebral level. SpineQ v1.1 consistently showed comparable Area Under the Curve (AUROC) and higher diagnostic accuracy compared to experts in detecting any fracture and moderate/severe fractures across vertebral, regional, and patient-level analyses. Students consistently exhibited the lowest AUROC and diagnostic accuracy across all levels and comparisons.
conclusionWhen specifically trained to detect a distinct condition like vertebral fractures, advanced algorithms can show comparable performance as experts. KEY POINTS: Question Can dedicated deep learning-based algorithms improve diagnostic performance for accurate detection and grading of osteoporotic vertebral fractures on CT scans? Findings Deep learning models specifically trained for vertebral fracture detection and grading can reach comparable performance as experts for the identification and grading of osteoporotic fractures. Clinical relevance Specifically trained deep learning models represent a valuable advancement for improving the identification and grading of osteoporotic fractures in clinical practice, bringing these tools a significant step closer to routine clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.