ArticleBrain and behavior2026
Postural Control and Executive Functions in Individuals With Intellectual Disabilities: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Brain and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of the study was to compare the postural control of individuals with intellectual disabilities (ID) according to their level of executive function, considering different visual and postural conditions and center of pressure (COP) measures.
designA cross-sectional study.
settingThe participants were users of sheltered housing services and day centers.
participants45 adults with ID.
interventionsNot Applicable. OUTCOME MEASURES: The data collected included COP measures under various visual and postural conditions, as well as executive function measures in tests of cognitive flexibility, working memory, and inhibitory control. The data were analyzed using mixed analysis of variance (ANOVA).
resultsDifferences in postural control were observed according to the level of executive function and between the closed-base, eyes-open condition (CBEO) and the open-base, eyes-open (OBEO) and open-base, eyes-closed (OBEC) conditions (p < 0.01; η
conclusionIndividuals with ID who exhibited lower executive function performance showed larger anteroposterior and mediolateral displacements, as well as increased COP area and velocity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.