Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41733546›Full record

SynthesisClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2026

Point-of-care Tests for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae: Review of the Literature.

Yukari C Manabe, Amanda C Smith, Susan Trow, Anthony Tran, Barbara Van Der Pol

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yukari C ManabeDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8619-5598
Amanda C SmithDivision of STD Prevention, National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5698-872X
Susan TrowAssociation of Public Health Laboratories, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Anthony TranCalifornia Department of Public Health, Center for Laboratory Sciences, Richmond, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0536-8819
Barbara Van Der PolDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3064-8564

Funding

LC: HIV Prevention Trials Network - Laboratory Support for the SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence Study (CoVPN 5002)UM1AI068613 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SUSAN H ESHLEMAN, Mark A Marzinke · 2011 to 2026
$100.2M
TrainingU54EB007958 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Matthew Hamill · 2007 to 2026
$34.6M
CDC HHS OE20-2001Enhancing Public Health Capabilities and Increasing CapacityNIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI068613NIBIB NIH HHS U54 EB007958
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPoint-of-care tests (POCTs) for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae offer the potential for rapid diagnosis and treatment, improving patient outcomes and reducing disease transmission. We sought to compile evidence on the accuracy and clinical utility of molecular-based POCTs and near-POCTs for the detection of C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae.

methodsWe performed a systematic literature search of 5 electronic databases from January 2009 to January 2024 to understand the performance characteristics and implementation considerations associated with Food and Drug Administration-cleared POCTs and near-POCTs. Results were described in a narrative format.

resultsFrom 3743 identified studies, 64 met our inclusion criteria. As of 2025, there are 4 Food and Drug Administration-cleared POCTs/near-POCTs for detecting C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae, 3 of which are waived by the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments and suitable for use during a patient visit. Evidence suggests that POCTs are most beneficial in symptomatic patients within acute care settings, where they can prevent loss to follow-up and reduce the need for empiric antibiotic treatment.

conclusionsWhile some POCTs for C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae have achieved regulatory clearance, challenges remain, including the need to expand specimen type clearance to include extragenital specimens, to further improve turnaround times, and to decrease cost for adoption. There is need to optimize the use of POCTs in acute care settings to manage sexually transmitted infections.

Indexed as

Chlamydia InfectionsChlamydia trachomatisGonorrheaNeisseria gonorrhoeaePoint-of-Care TestingHumansPoint-of-Care SystemsRapid Diagnostic TestsSensitivity and Specificitychlamydiagonorrheapoint-of-care testsreview

Identifiers

PMID41733546
PMCPMC13084200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.