ArticleJACC. Case reports2026
Pericardial Decompression Syndrome After Large-Volume Pericardiocentesis in Systemic Sclerosis.
Article in JACC. Case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPericardial decompression syndrome (PDS) is a rare and underrecognized complication of pericardiocentesis, characterized by paradoxical hemodynamic deterioration after relief of pericardial effusion. CASE SUMMARY: A 32-year-old woman with systemic sclerosis presented with chest pain and was found to have a large pericardial effusion with early tamponade physiology. She underwent rapid, large-volume pericardiocentesis. Hours later, she developed acute respiratory failure and cardiac arrest. Repeat echocardiography demonstrated new severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction without recurrent effusion, consistent with PDS. Misinterpretation as recurrent tamponade led to emergent repeat pericardiocentesis complicated by right ventricular perforation requiring surgical repair. Ventricular function fully recovered with supportive care. DISCUSSION: PDS is infrequently recognized and may be precipitated by rapid drainage in patients with chronic effusions and underlying myocardial disease, such as systemic sclerosis. TAKE-HOME MESSAGES: Postpericardiocentesis deterioration should prompt consideration of PDS rather than reflexive repeat drainage. Slower or staged pericardial drainage may reduce the risk of catastrophic complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.