ArticleThe European journal of general practice2026
Primary health care policy advocacy in Europe: A cross-sectional study of family medicine associations.
Article in The European journal of general practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPolicy advocacy (PA) in European healthcare has a strong tradition promoting evidence-based policies. Key organisations, including the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, the WHO's Evidence-Informed Policy Network, and the OECD play pivotal roles in integrating research into policymaking.
objectivesTo assess the involvement of European Family Medicine (FM) Associations in PA, identify key issues, and explore interactions with governmental and institutional bodies related to Primary Health Care (PHC)-defined as first-contact, continuous, comprehensive, and coordinated care provided by general practitioners/family doctors (GPs), in line with the WHO Alma-Ata and Astana declarations-and perceived challenges in PHC advocacy.
methodsAn exploratory descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted among WONCA Europe Member Organisations and GPs involved in PA. Data collected between November 2023 and February 2024. Content analysis was performed to identify themes related to advocacy priorities.
resultsResponses were received from 12 member organisations across 12 countries and 37 participants from 17 countries. Key concerns included workforce shortages, high workloads, inadequate infrastructure, and insufficient financial compensation. Public visibility, gender equality, and the integration of FM into university curricula were also highlighted. Eleven respondents reported active engagement with national governments in policy discussions.
conclusionRespondents highlighted the need for a more unified strategy to address common PHC challenges across Europe. WONCA Europe's Working Party on PA supports national efforts through exchange of best practices, research support, and promoting FM at national and European levels. Continued research and advocacy were viewed as essential for sustaining effective and equitable PHC in Europe.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.