ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2026
Nutritional adaptation in the marine to freshwater establishment process - how do diet and genotype shape phenotype?
Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Genomic Signatures of Selection Are Enriched in Differentially Expressed Genes in Sticklebacks Adapting to Contrasting Environments.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nutrients, including vital organic compounds, vary in availability across ecosystems, with the potential to act as a strong source of selection for traits that increase nutrient acquisition and biosynthesis. Compared with freshwater ecosystems, marine ecosystems are much richer in the omega-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and thus marine animals establishing new freshwater populations are faced with the challenge of acquiring DHA. However, the relative roles of DHA synthesis capacity and diet in the freshwater establishment process remain unresolved. We used common garden experiments to explore phenotypic responses to dietary nutrient content in threespine sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) that varied in their genetic capacity for DHA synthesis. We found that diet as well as presumed metabolic adaptation to freshwater nutritional environments (population identity) had strong effects on stickleback phenotype and performance. Sticklebacks enriched with marine-derived fatty acids including DHA grew more and were in better condition compared with controls. Those fed diets with more DHA also accumulated more DHA in muscle tissue. Freshwater sticklebacks accumulated more DHA compared with those from a marine population. However, populations with greater fads2 copy number did not consistently have higher performance or DHA accumulation. Together, these results suggest that DHA availability during development can strongly influence phenotype and performance, with the potential to act as a source of selection. Our findings also suggest that mechanisms beyond the accumulation of fads2 copies, such as plasticity in expression or variation in other DHA synthesis pathway genes, could be important adaptations to the nutritional constraints of freshwater.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.