ReviewFEMS microbiology reviews2026
Exploring cooperation among social pathogens: a computational perspective.
Review in FEMS microbiology reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Quorum Sensing and Quorum Quenching in Periodontal Disease: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Potential.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Once centered on animal social behavior, investigations into cooperation have expanded across the tree of life to include micro-organisms such as bacteria and viruses. Cooperative interactions are now understood to drive evolutionary dynamics within and between numerous microbial species and communities, including pathogen adaptation to and persistence in new hosts and environments. Identification and characterization of the underlying mechanisms of cooperation offer innovative opportunities for therapeutic interventions targeting difficult-to-treat pathogens through disruption of interactive networks. The current gold standards for evaluating micro-organismal cooperation often rely on assessing coordinated changes of phenotypic traits and the genetic and environmental factors that can affect them. Among these approaches, in vitro methods are labor-intensive, time-consuming, and often fail to replicate the natural microenvironment. Computational methods applied in vivo offer scalability and applicability but often require prior knowledge of metabolic pathways, restricting their use to bacterial systems. In contrast, sequence- and phylogeny-based frameworks can extend to viral datasets, though are typically con- strained by smaller sample sizes and incomplete annotations. Herein we focus on existing computational approaches used in identifying and/or characterizing cooperation and detail their advantages and limitations in shaping our understanding of cooperative pathogens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.