ReviewCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2026
Assessment and Benchmarking of Model Informed Approaches in Drug Development for Hemoglobinopathies: A Review of Scientific Advices From January 2000 to December 2024.
Review in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Use of Modeling and Simulation to Inform the Development of Monoclonal Antibodies to Treat Moderate-to-Severe Asthma: A Retrospective Review of EMA Centralized Procedure From 2014 to 2024.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2026Article
- Assessment and Benchmarking of Model Informed Approaches in Drug Development for Hemoglobinopathies: A Review of Scientific Advices From January 2000 to December 2024.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the fact that modeling and simulation are now recognized as promising innovative methodologies, their use in the context of development of drugs for sickle cell disease and Thalassemia has not yet been reviewed. Considering the challenges of conducting clinical trials for hemoglobinopathies, our work aims at exploring the current status of use of modeling and simulation by drug developers and their endorsement by regulators, based on European Medicines Agency scientific advices given to industry by the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use from January 2000 to December 2024. The present study describes different aspects of how modeling and simulation methods have been used and assessed. Our results highlight the need for an openly accessible structured framework that details the standards/criteria that make a method acceptable for regulators. The use of the ICH M15 credibility assessment framework is suggested for this purpose. Bearing in mind the question-centric approach, a repository of drug development questions and associated methods and data was built from 45 and 31 scientific advices for sickle cell disease and Thalassemia, respectively. The classification of the questions, methods and data based on the question-centric approach enabled modeling and simulation methods to be easily identified, objectively assessed and benchmarked against alternative methods used to address the same questions to evaluate their performance for characterizing benefit/risk of the different drugs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.