Trial reportArthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.)2026
Baseline Interleukin-10 Levels as a Predictive Biomarker for Achieving Clinical Response With Abatacept in Patients Who Were Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug Naive and Anti-Citrullinated Protein Antibody Positive With Early Rheumatoid Arthritis.
Trial report in Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02504268 (A Phase 3B, Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Abatacept SC in Combination With Methotrexate Compared to Methotrexate Monotherapy in Achieving Clinical Remission in Adults With Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Are Methotrexate Naive), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 3B, Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Abatacept SC in Combination With Methotrexate Compared to Methotrexate Monotherapy in Achieving Clinical Remission in Adults With Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Are Methotrexate Naive
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivePredictive biomarkers for patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are needed. This exploratory post hoc analysis investigated inflammatory biomarkers associated with baseline disease activity and biomarkers predictive of treatment response in patients who were seropositive with early RA from a phase 3 study.
methodsThe AVERT-2 study (NCT02504268) included patients who were disease-modifying antirheumatic drug naive and anti-citrullinated protein antibody positive randomized to abatacept and methotrexate (MTX) or placebo and MTX for 56 weeks. Correlations were assessed among biomarkers and disease activity, pharmacodynamic (PD) changes on disease-associated biomarkers in response to treatment, and baseline biomarkers to predict treatment response at week 52.
resultsIn the analysis, 446 patients received abatacept and MTX and 300 received placebo and MTX. Of 103 biomarkers, 47 demonstrated a significant reduction in PD changes with abatacept and MTX versus placebo and MTX, with 18 out of 47 biomarkers showing correlations with baseline disease activity. High baseline interleukin-10 (IL-10) levels were associated with greater probability of achieving efficacy measures by week 52 in patients receiving abatacept and MTX versus placebo and MTX, consistent with a significant reduction in disease activity with abatacept and MTX (P < 0.03 to P < 0.0007). Higher baseline IL-10 levels were associated with lower bone erosive development with abatacept and MTX compared with placebo and MTX.
conclusionTreatment with abatacept and MTX resulted in significantly greater reduction of biomarkers relevant to RA, and high baseline IL-10 levels predicted better treatment response with abatacept and MTX versus placebo and MTX across clinical outcomes. Findings suggest a well-suited mechanism of action for abatacept and MTX in patients with early RA and high baseline IL-10 levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.