ReviewCirculation2026
Malnutrition and Cachexia in Inpatients With Acute Cardiac Conditions: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.
Review in Circulation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hemodynamic-Guided Nutrition Support in Pediatric Congenital Heart Disease.Current nutrition reports · 2026Review
- Review
- Article
- Nutritional Status and Cardiovascular Disease in Older Adults: Clinical Perspectives from Mechanisms to Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- An interpretable AutoML-based prediction model for enteral nutrition intolerance in severe pulmonary tuberculosis patients and development of a clinical decision system.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Factors associated with nutritional status improvement in hospitalized oldest-old adults at nutritional risk.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Timing, continuity, and energy dose of oral nutritional supplements in older coronary care unit patients: associations with prognostic nutritional index trajectory and hospitalization burden.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Malnutrition can affect patients with various acute cardiovascular disease conditions, including acute coronary syndromes, arrhythmias, or valvular disease; however, most of the literature has focused on patients with heart failure. Malnutrition prevalence estimates range from 20% to 60% for hospitalized patients. Use of Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition criteria for malnutrition diagnosis for patients with cardiovascular disease has confirmed prognostic value, correlating with poorer physical function and higher mortality. Nutritional support plays a key role for inpatients, particularly in the cardiac intensive care unit, and includes initiation of feeding within 48 hours of hospitalization, preferably through enteral nutrition. Enteral nutrition is more cost-effective compared with parenteral nutrition and can decrease mortality and shorten lengths of stay. Parenteral nutrition is reserved for patients with severe gastrointestinal dysfunction or to supplement nutrition when enteral nutrition is contraindicated, for example, during high pressor doses that preclude adequate intestinal perfusion or when achieving <70% of nutritional targets after the first week. The optimal protein intake for patients with cardiogenic shock is an area of ongoing research, with higher protein approaches not appearing beneficial in recent critical care trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.