Observational studyJournal of advanced nursing2026
Head Nurse's Ethical Leadership, Work Environment and Patients' Outcomes: A Multicentre Cross-Sectional Multilevel Study.
Observational study in Journal of advanced nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Towards Healthy Work Environments: Development and Validation of the Nursing Organizational Well-Being Questionnaire-A Theory-Based Measure.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimTo investigate the relationship between nursing ethical leadership style, work environment (workload, interpersonal conflicts) and patients' objective nursing-sensitive outcomes (accidental falls, pressure ulcers, nosocomial infections, restraints and deaths).
designNationwide multicentre cross-sectional multilevel survey.
methodsValidated self-report scales were used to assess nurses' perceptions of ethical leadership, workload and interpersonal conflict. Nursing staffing and objective patient' nursing-sensitive outcomes were measured at the ward level. Descriptive and inferential analyses were conducted. Structural equation modelling examined the relationships among these variables based on Donabedian's conceptual framework.
resultsData from 2349 nurses across 158 wards in 25 Italian acute care hospitals were analysed. The multilevel model showed an excellent fit. Ethical leadership was negatively associated with both workload and interpersonal conflict. Workload was significantly linked to higher rates of pressure ulcers, falls and deaths in patients. Ethical leadership was indirectly associated with improved patient outcomes through reduced workload.
conclusionHead nurses' ethical leadership has a pivotal role in shaping the work environment and enhancing nursing-sensitive outcomes by reducing workload and fostering positive interpersonal dynamics. These findings emphasise the need for healthcare organisations to invest in ethical leadership development as a critical strategy for improving care quality and promoting better patient outcomes. IMPACT: These findings emphasise the need for healthcare organisations to invest in ethical leadership development as a critical strategy for improving care quality and promoting safer, more effective patient outcomes. REPORTING
methodThe study adhered to The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology checklist. NO PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This study did not include patient or public involvement. WHAT DOES THIS PAPER CONTRIBUTE TO THE WIDER GLOBAL CLINICAL COMMUNITY?: Cultivating moral values and principles in leadership enables leaders to effectively communicate these values to their staff. Addressing unethical behaviours, fostering open dialogue about organisational ethics, and supporting leaders in the ethical decision-making process contribute to a healthier nurses' work environment. Healthcare organisations investing in the development and promotion of ethical leaders improve care quality. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: The study was registered in the research registry (www.researchregistry.com) under the record number (researchregistry7418), following a published protocol.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.