Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41732812›Full record

ArticleNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2026

Unconscious effects of addiction-specific attentional bias and the wanting-liking imbalance in smoking: a visual mismatch negativity study.

Domonkos File, Petia Kojouharova, Bela Petro, Zsófia Anna Gaál, Zsolt Demetrovics, István Czigler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Domonkos FileInstitute of Psychology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, 1064 Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-2154-335X
Petia KojouharovaResearch Centre for Natural Sciences, Eötvös Loránd Research Network, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychology, 1519 Budapest, Hungary.
Bela PetroPázmány Péter Catholic University, 1428 Budapest, Hungary.
Zsófia Anna GaálResearch Centre for Natural Sciences, Eötvös Loránd Research Network, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychology, 1519 Budapest, Hungary.
Zsolt DemetrovicsInstitute of Psychology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, 1064 Budapest, Hungary.
István CziglerResearch Centre for Natural Sciences, Eötvös Loránd Research Network, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychology, 1519 Budapest, Hungary.

Funding

Ministry of Innovation and Technology of HungaryNational Research, Development and Innovation FundNational Research, Development and Innovation Office STARTING150779
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCognitive theories of addiction highlight attentional bias as a key factor in the development and maintenance of addictive behaviors. According to Incentive Sensitization Theory (IST), repeated substance exposure sensitizes the brain's reward system, increasing the salience of substance-related cues and producing attentional bias that operates automatically, beyond conscious control. This study investigated (1) automatic change detection, indexed by the visual mismatch negativity (vMMN)  electroencephalography (EEG) component, in smokers (N = 20) and non-smokers (N = 20), and (2) the relationship between self-reported wanting and liking in smokers and its association with vMMN.

methodsEEG was recorded while participants completed a primary task. Peripheral, task unrelated stimuli were presented in smoking-related and neutral conditions. Smokers also completed the Imaginative Wanting and Liking Questionnaire and were assessed for nicotine dependence.

resultsIn smokers, a posterior vMMN response was observed between 147 and 188 ms in the smoking-related condition, but not in the neutral condition or in non-smokers. Additionally, vMMN amplitude was negatively correlated with the difference between self-reported wanting and liking.

conclusionsThese findings support IST by showing that attentional bias toward substance related cues can influence early, automatic cognitive processing. The vMMN results suggest that this bias extends beyond the focus of conscious attention. Moreover, the correlation between vMMN and self-reported wanting-liking discrepancy highlights the potential of subjective measures to reflect IST-relevant mechanisms. This offers promising implications for future research, treatment development, and intervention strategies targeting early attentional processes in nicotine addiction. IMPLICATIONS: The results suggest that the well-documented attentional bias in nicotine dependence emerges at early stages of visual processing and is elicited by stimuli presented outside the focus of attention. This indicates a highly automatic neural response to smoking-related cues, supporting the view that attentional bias in addiction operates independently of conscious control. The presence of a smoking-related vMMN suggests that neural indices may capture more fundamental and preconscious aspects of attentional bias than traditional behavioral measures, highlighting their potential utility in advancing both theoretical models and intervention strategies targeting automatic cognitive processes in nicotine addiction.

Indexed as

Attentional BiasBehavior, AddictiveSmokingTobacco Use DisorderAdultCuesElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleMotivationYoung Adultattentional biasIncentive Sensitization Theory of addictionstobacco smokingvisual mismatch negativitywanting-liking

Identifiers

PMID41732812
PMCPMC13389528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.