Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41732778›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology science2026

Federated Learning for Multi-Disease Ophthalmic Diagnostics Using OCT Angiography.

Ahammed Sakir Nabil, Sina Gholami, Theodore Leng, Jennifer I Lim, Minhaj Nur Alam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ahammed Sakir NabilDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina.
Sina GholamiDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina.
Theodore LengDepartment of Ophthalmology, Byers Eye Institute at Stanford, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Jennifer I LimDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Minhaj Nur AlamDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina.

Funding

Pilot & Feasibility ProgramP30DK124723 · NIDDK · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Morgana Lee Mongraw-Chaffin · 2020 to 2026
$11.0M
Stanford Vision Research CoreP30EY026877 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Jeffrey L Goldberg · 2017 to 2026
$8.0M
Distributed approaches to train machine learning models in diabetic retinopathyR15EY035804 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE · PI ALAM, MINHAJ NUR · 2024 to 2024
$460k
Domain-adaptive federated learning to develop machine learning models for predicting incident and progression of geographic atrophyR21EY035271 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE · PI ALAM, MINHAJ NUR · 2024 to 2024
$379k
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY026877NEI NIH HHS R15 EY035804NEI NIH HHS R21 EY035271NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK124723
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To conduct a comprehensive systematic evaluation of federated learning (FL) strategies for multi-disease retinal classification using OCT angiography (OCTA), implementing a 2-part experimental framework to establish foundational feasibility and optimize performance under realistic heterogeneous conditions while ensuring privacy preservation. Design: Retrospective multi-center FL study using a systematic 2-part experimental design: (1) foundational feasibility evaluation under controlled homogeneous conditions, and (2) comprehensive optimization under realistic heterogeneous conditions using Dirichlet distribution partitioning ( Participants: A total of 456 OCTA images from patients with 7 retinal pathologies, with diabetic retinopathy (31.1%) and normal cases (25.2%) comprising the majority, sourced from the public OCTA-500 data set (n = 300) and a private collection from the University of Illinois Chicago (n = 156). Methods: Five FL aggregation strategies (federated averaging [FedAvg], federated proximal [FedProx], federated magnetic resonance imaging [FedMRI], federated Adagrad, and federated Yogi) were systematically evaluated across multiple optimization dimensions: 7 architecture configurations spanning vision transformers, established convolutional neural networks, and hybrid models; 5 transfer learning freezing strategies; 3 local epoch configurations (2, 5, and 10); and scalability analysis across 2, 3, and 5-client federations. Security mechanisms including differential privacy (ε = 1.0-8.0) and secure aggregation were integrated and evaluated. Performance was assessed across 3 classification scenarios: 7-class, 4-class modified, and 4-class streamlined. Main Outcome Measures: Classification accuracy, receiver-operating-characteristic area under the curve (ROC-AUC), and macro-averaged F1-score with comprehensive privacy-utility analysis and computational efficiency metrics. Results: Under controlled conditions, FL achieved superior performance in simplified classifications, with FedAvg, FedProx, and FedMRI reaching 72.09% accuracy versus 69.77% centralized training. Comprehensive optimization identified DenseNet121 as optimal architecture (79.55% accuracy, 89.68% ROC-AUC), with "most" freezing strategy (75% frozen layers) providing 60% training time reduction while maintaining superior performance. Federated proximal demonstrated exceptional resilience to heterogeneity (-11.7% degradation). Bonawitz secure aggregation achieved optimal privacy-utility balance (63.64% accuracy with cryptographic guarantees), whereas differential privacy maintained clinical utility under moderate constraints (ε ≈ 4-6). Conclusions: This systematic evaluation establishes FL as a comprehensive solution for privacy-preserving multi-institutional OCTA-based disease classification, with careful architectural selection, optimization strategies, and security mechanisms enabling performance that matches or exceeds centralized approaches while maintaining regulatory compliance and clinical utility. Financial Disclosures: The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Indexed as

Age related macular degeneration (AMD)Diabetic retinopathy (DR)Federated learningOptical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA)Privacy-preserving artificial intelligence

Identifiers

PMID41732778
PMCPMC12925154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.