ArticlePreventive medicine reports2026
Adherence to breast and cervical cancer screening guidelines according to obesity status: a French cross-sectional multicenter survey.
Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To assess breast and cervical cancer screening rates among women according to body mass index (BMI). Methods: This cross-sectional study used anonymous self-administered questionnaires given to women from three French university hospitals with normal weight (BMI 18.5-25 kg/m Results: Among 439 women (20% class I, 22% class II obesity), 178 and 370 were eligible for breast and cervical cancer screening, respectively. Women with class I and II obesity were less likely to be up-to-date for clinical breast exams (Odds Ratio [95% confidence interval] 2.35[1.06,5.20] and 2.68[1.12,6.42], respectively), mammography (4.43[1.49,13.18] and 4.08[1.22,13.62]), and cervical samples (2.23[1.09,4.54] and 2.85[1.42,5.72]). Class II obesity was associated with more frequent follow-up by general practitioners ( Conclusions: Women with obesity are less likely to receive recommended gynecological cancer screenings than normal-weight peers. These disparities call for more inclusive healthcare strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.