ArticleLancet regional health. Americas2026
Daily Chlorhexidine Bathing for the Prevention of Nosocomial Infections in Critically Ill Patients (CLEAN-IT): a multicentre, cluster-randomised, crossover trial.
Article in Lancet regional health. Americas, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05485051 (Impact of Chlorhexidine Bath on Healthcare-associated Infections Acquisitions in Intensive Care Units - A Cluster Randomized Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Impact of Chlorhexidine Bath on Healthcare-associated Infections Acquisitions in Intensive Care Units - A Cluster Randomized Trial
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of daily bathing with 2% chlorhexidine compared to bathing with soap and water on risk of death, clinical severity, and intensive care unit length of stay in critically ill patients: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026Review
- Does alternate-day bathing with 2% chlorhexidine improve clinical outcomes in critically ill patients? A systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
38 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Critically ill patients are at risk of nosocomial infections, acquisition of multidrug-resistant pathogens, and substantial antimicrobial consumption. We assessed whether bathing with chlorhexidine reduces these outcomes compared to standard practices. Methods: We conducted an open-label, cluster-randomised crossover trial in 22 Brazilian intensive care units comparing daily chlorhexidine bathing versus soap and water bathing (control). Centres were randomised to 3- or 6-months chlorhexidine or control periods, separated by a 1-month washout. Primary outcome was nosocomial infection rate (central line-associated bloodstream infections, catheter-associated urinary tract infections, and ventilator-associated pneumonia) during ICU stay. Secondary outcomes included specific nosocomial infections incidence, multi-drug resistant cultures, antibiotic use, length of stay, and mortality. This completed trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05485051. Findings: From August 1st, 2022 to December 31, 2023, we included 15,935 patients (8247 chlorhexidine and 7688 control group). Mean age was 64·4 years (SD 17·3) in the chlorhexidine group [4315 (52·3%) male] and 64·2 years (SD 17·4) in the control group [4035 (52·5%) male]. A total of 201 nosocomial infections occurred in the chlorhexidine group, compared to 165 in the control group. There was no statistically significant difference in the overall nosocomial infections rate between groups [3·99 per 1000 patient-days in the chlorhexidine group and 3·45 per 1000 patient-days in the control group (rate-ratio, 1·09; 95% CI 0·95-1·25; p = 0·22)]. Patients in the chlorhexidine group had lower rates of multi-drug resistant cultures compared to the control group (14·42 vs. 20·13 per 1000 patient-days, rate-ratio, 0·73; 95% CI 0·59-0·91; p = 0·0092). Although overall antimicrobial consumption defined by WHO's DDD did not differ between groups (rate-ratio, 0·91; 95% CI 0·80-1·03; p = 0·14), there was a statistically significant difference in the consumption of antimicrobials in the Reserve group of WHO's AWaRe classification (rate-ratio, 0·73; 95% CI 0·59-0·90; p = 0·0071) in the chlorhexidine group. This reduction was not associated with higher mortality. Interpretation: Chlorhexidine bathing did not reduce the incidence of nosocomial infections in a general ICU population, but contributed to lower rates of multi-drug resistant pathogen isolation, and lower use of Reserve antimicrobials, potentially leading to a qualitative modification of antimicrobial use. Funding: This study was funded by the Brazilian Health Ministry through the Programa de Apoio ao Desenvolvimento Institucional do Sistema Único de Saúde (PROADI-SUS).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.