Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41732676›Full record

ArticleJHLT open2026

Waitlist and post-transplant outcomes in rural communities with the current heart transplant allocation.

Mohammad U Ahmed, Michael Dickinson, David Fermin, Milena Jani, Eesha Purohit, Matthew Gonzalez, Ryan Grayburn, Sangjin Lee, Nabin K Shrestha, Dana Marsy and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JHLT open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Mohammad U AhmedCorewell Health Frederik Meijer Heart and Vascular Institute, Grand Rapids, MI.
Michael DickinsonCorewell Health Frederik Meijer Heart and Vascular Institute, Grand Rapids, MI.
David FerminCorewell Health Frederik Meijer Heart and Vascular Institute, Grand Rapids, MI.
Milena JaniCorewell Health Frederik Meijer Heart and Vascular Institute, Grand Rapids, MI.
Eesha PurohitCorewell Health Frederik Meijer Heart and Vascular Institute, Grand Rapids, MI.
Matthew GonzalezCorewell Health Frederik Meijer Heart and Vascular Institute, Grand Rapids, MI.
Ryan GrayburnCorewell Health Frederik Meijer Heart and Vascular Institute, Grand Rapids, MI.
Sangjin LeeCorewell Health Frederik Meijer Heart and Vascular Institute, Grand Rapids, MI.
Nabin K ShresthaCorewell Health Frederik Meijer Heart and Vascular Institute, Grand Rapids, MI.
Dana MarsyCorewell Health Frederik Meijer Heart and Vascular Institute, Grand Rapids, MI.
Robert HookerCorewell Health Frederik Meijer Heart and Vascular Institute, Grand Rapids, MI.
Erin McNeelyMichigan State University College of Human Medicine, Grand Rapids, MI.
Richard C SadlerMichigan State University College of Human Medicine, Grand Rapids, MI.
Renzo Y Loyaga-RendonCorewell Health Frederik Meijer Heart and Vascular Institute, Grand Rapids, MI.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The OPTN heart transplant allocation policy implemented in 2018 led to significant improvements in waitlist outcomes, but disparities persist. Our study evaluated the effect of the implementation of the new allocation on waitlist and post-transplantation outcomes in rural versus urban communities. Methods: Patients registered for HT in the OPTN database between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2021, were included as rural or urban according to ZIP code. The cumulative incidence (CI) of death/delisting and transplantation in the different allocations were calculated. Post-transplant survival was calculated using Kaplan-Meier methodology. Results: 26,450 patients were listed for transplant. Rural residents were more commonly white and had a higher incidence of ischemic cardiomyopathy. Both allocations saw a similar decrease in the CI of death/delisting from the wait list and an increase in the CI of HT in both rural and urban communities. In the prior allocation, no differences existed in the CI of death/delisting or transplantation between rural and urban residents. In the current allocation, rural residents had a higher frequency of death/delisting (p=0.01) after adjusting for risk factors. No differences existed in the CI of transplantation or post-transplant survival. Conslusions: Our findings suggest that despite an overall decrease in CI of death/delisting in both rural and urban communities, rural residence is associated with a disproportionately higher CI of death/delisting on the transplant list in the current allocation. We found no differences in the CI of transplantation or survival after transplant.

Indexed as

Health disparitiesHeart transplantationOrgan allocationUNOSWaitlist outcomes

Identifiers

PMID41732676
PMCPMC12925163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.