ArticleJournal of oral biology and craniofacial research
Optimizing graphene-enhanced polycaprolactone scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.
Article in Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Polycaprolactone (PCL) is widely used in scaffold fabrication due to its biocompatibility and mechanical properties, yet its limited osteoinductive capability hinders effective bone regeneration. To address this, graphene (G) has been incorporated into PCL scaffolds to enhance bioactivity, mechanical strength, and osteogenic potential. Objective: This study evaluates the osteogenic efficacy of PCL/G composite scaffolds by analyzing osteocalcin (OCN) and osteopontin (OPN) expression and mineralization using Alizarin Red staining. Methods: Thirty-six adult male rabbits were randomized to four groups and evaluated on day 7, 14 and 21. The PCL/G scaffolds were fabricated using the solvent casting and particle leaching method. A left tibial incision was made and exposing the site for osteotomy. Scaffolds were implanted, and wounds closed. Expression of OCN and OPN were evaluated by immunochemistry and mineralization was evaluated by Alizarin Red staining. Results: The results indicate that increasing graphene concentration significantly enhances osteogenic activity, with 2.5 wt% graphene demonstrating the highest OCN and OPN expression, as well as superior calcium deposition. Conclusions: These findings highlight the potential of graphene-based scaffolds in promoting bone regeneration and accelerating clinical translation. Future research should focus on long-term in vivo studies and scaffold degradation kinetics to validate their effectiveness in maxillofacial bone defects due to oral cancer surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.