ArticleJournal of patient experience2026
Hospital Patient and Family Advisory Councils: A Quantitative Study on How Councils are Used and Predictors of Effective Councils.
Article in Journal of patient experience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patient and family advisory councils (PFACs) are a key strategy in advancing patient-centeredness, heralded by the Institute of Medicine as a goal to improve healthcare quality. Although PFACs have been around since the 1980s, they exist in only 54% of US hospitals, according to the American Hospital Association's annual survey of 6100 hospitals. This research aimed to identify key predictors of PFAC effectiveness, since previous studies had lacked descriptions of these factors. Using the C-OAR-SE theory, this quantitative, validated survey of 60 questions was answered by 203 respondents who worked or had worked with PFACs in US hospitals. The results revealed that leadership support was significantly associated with increased meeting content, stronger measurement practices, and more frequent decision-making and involvement with policies and procedures. PFACs, focused on conditions or patient types rather than general PFACs, scored higher on multiple factors, including meeting content, measurement practices, level of engagement, and coaching and training members. This study highlights the key drivers of effective operations and reinforces the value of patient-centeredness in integrating the patient and family voice into hospital initiatives through PFACs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.