ArticleTherapeutic advances in medical oncology2026
Clinical subtypes in breast cancer patients with brain metastases from an ambispective registry of advanced breast cancer, GEICAM/2014-03 (RegistEM).
Article in Therapeutic advances in medical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Breast cancer frequently results in brain metastases (BCBM), leading to poor outcomes. Central nervous system (CNS) involvement entails significant challenges in advanced breast cancer (ABC) patients. Objectives: To characterize BCBM patients according to surrogate clinical BC subtypes and evaluate the interval between ABC and BCBM detection, both at ABC diagnosis (BCBM1 cohort) and for those who develop BCBM subsequently (BCBM2 cohort). Secondary objectives included analyzing the time-related outcomes by BC subtype. Design: RegistEM is an ongoing ambispective, observational study of ABC patients diagnosed since January/2016. Methods: We describe the characteristics of BCBM patients reported by January 22, 2024, categorized by BC subtype on the most recent tumor sample obtained before first-line therapy. Results: At the cutoff date, 346/1947 (18%) patients diagnosed with ABC between January/2016 and December/2019 developed BCBM, and 288/346 (83%) died. All patients were female, predominantly Caucasian (98%), with a median age of 55 years at ABC diagnosis. The distribution by subtype was 170/346 (49%) HR+/HER2-, 68/346 (20%) HR+/HER2+, 54/346 (16%) HR-/HER2+, and 51/346 (15%) HR-/HER2- (triple negative (TN)). One-fourth (85/346) were in the BCBM1 cohort, with 22/85 (26%) having BCBM as the only metastatic location; in this cohort, median time to BCBM was 38 months, with shorter intervals in HR-/HER2+ and TN subtypes (17 and 18 months, respectively). In the BCBM2 cohort (261/346), the median time to BCBM was 24 months, with the shortest interval in TN (13 months). Median survival from BCBM diagnosis was 26 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 20-35) in BCBM1 and 9 months (95% CI, 7-12) in BCBM2 (hazard ratio, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.7-3.0); TN subtype showed the poorest results (median of 6 months; 95% CI, 3-13). Conclusion: TN and HER2+ BC subtypes progressed faster to BCBM and had worse outcomes. Survival differed significantly between the two cohorts, BCBM1 and BCBM2. Continued research is essential to improve the treatment and prevention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.