ArticleTherapeutic advances in medical oncology2026
A computer vision method to evaluate tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and multiparametric modeling of neoadjuvant systemic therapy response in breast cancer.
Article in Therapeutic advances in medical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) is often used to treat locally advanced breast cancer (BC) or patients with early-stage BC at high risk for micrometastatic spread. Pathological complete response (pCR) to NST in BC is associated with excellent prognostic outcomes; however, rates vary significantly. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are associated with NST response, suggesting potential as predictive biomarkers. Objective: To develop a computer vision approach to quantify spatial TIL parameters and a multiparametric machine learning (ML) model for predicting NST response. Design: Retrospective, single institution study of 411 BC patients, combining clinical and graph-level pre-treatment histopathology data to predict response to NST using ML. Methods: Pre-treatment core needle biopsies were prepared, stained with hematoxylin and eosin, and digitized into whole slide images. Convolutional neural networks were applied to segment and classify regions of invasive carcinoma and TILs. Spatial features were extracted based on the coordinates of the TILs within invasive regions, including metrics from Delaunay triangulation, Voronoi diagram analysis, and minimum spanning trees, as well as features capturing cell density and nuclear count. Clinicopathological features were incorporated to support multiparametric modeling. Multiple ML classification models were trained to predict pCR. Logistic regression, K-nearest neighbor, support vector, random forest, Gaussian Naïve Bayes, and extreme gradient boosting models were tested, and model performances were reported. Results: ML models using clinical and graph-based features achieved high predictive accuracy. The best performing graph feature model reached an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.924. Ensemble models integrating clinical and graph features showed the highest performance, with an AUC of 0.955. Notably, for triple-negative BC, significant differences in predictive performance were demonstrated between clinical and graph feature models ( Conclusion: Multiparametric modeling utilizing clinicopathological and graph features obtained from TILs is associated with pCR in BC patients treated with NST.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.