ArticleCureus2026
Room to Move: Enhancing Head and Neck Radiotherapy With a Six-Degree-of-Freedom Couch.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose Image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) allows for a reduction in target volume margins, but relies on accurate daily set-up. Six-degree-of-freedom couches offer rotational adjustments during alignment. Given the often large and irregular target volumes treated in head and neck (H&N) cancers, rotational errors may contribute significantly to inter-fraction variability in both target coverage and critical-structure dose. We seek to evaluate the impact of rotational adjustments on target coverage and critical-structure dose in H&N radiotherapy. Methods We reviewed 214 radiotherapy fractions for H&N cancer. Patients were treated using a six-degree-of-freedom couch that allows a maximum of ±3° of roll, pitch, and yaw, in addition to linear shifts. Daily couch adjustments were recorded, and the CT simulation images and treatment plan were imported into the oncology management system to allow fusion. The delivered dose was recalculated with and without rotational components, with deviation thresholds for planning target volume (PTV) V70Gy coverage taken to be 3% and 5%. Results A rotational shift in at least one plane was used on 212 of 214 treatment fractions. Without rotational shifts, PTV V100% was lower by a median of 1.97% (1.77%-2.18%; 95% CI) compared to the planned coverage. Specifically, 43 (20%) fractions had a decrease in PTV V100% of ≥3% when rotational shifts were not applied, and 10 (4.7%) fractions had a decrease in PTV V100% of ≥5%. All 43 fractions with a ≥3% drop in PTV coverage required at least 1.5° rotational correction in at least one direction. Organs at risk (OAR) dose was less dependent on rotational correction, without significant correlations between the magnitude of rotational correction and increased OAR dose. Conclusion Rotational corrections are applied frequently when treating H&N cancers on a six-degree-of-freedom couch. Rotational adjustments had the greatest benefit on PTV coverage, while OAR doses were less dependent. These data highlight the utility of a six-degree-of-freedom couch for H&N radiotherapy and suggest a target set-up goal of less than 1.5° rotational error in all planes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.