ReviewCureus2026
Bridging Cardiac and Mental Health: Screening for Depression in Cardiology Settings.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Mental Health-Acute Coronary Syndrome Continuum: Bidirectional Pathophysiological Links and Clinical Implications.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Interplay of physical activity and sleep in modulating heart rate variability: insights from adults with major depressive disorder.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Depression is a highly prevalent comorbidity in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD), affecting approximately one in five cardiac patients and contributing to adverse cardiovascular outcomes, increased mortality, and reduced quality of life. Despite clinical guidelines from the American Heart Association recommending routine depression screening, implementation remains inconsistent across cardiology settings. This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on depression screening practices in cardiology clinics, examining prevalence, screening tools, and implementation barriers. The prevalence of depression in cardiovascular patients ranges from 15% to 30%, with higher rates observed in post-myocardial infarction and heart failure populations globally. The two-step screening approach using Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2) followed by Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) demonstrates optimal sensitivity (83-87%) and specificity (78-92%) while minimizing patient burden. Major implementation barriers include time constraints, inadequate workflow integration, insufficient mental health resources, provider knowledge gaps, and patient-level factors, including stigma and poor treatment acceptance. Successful implementation of depression screening in cardiology clinics requires multilevel strategies addressing system, provider, and patient factors through electronic health record integration, standardized protocols, collaborative care models, and stakeholder engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.