ArticleCureus2026
Real-World Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Upadacitinib, Tofacitinib, and Filgotinib in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, including upadacitinib, tofacitinib, and filgotinib, represent an emerging class of effective oral therapies for the treatment of moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC). We report a real-world retrospective study evaluating the comparative efficacy and safety of these three JAK inhibitors in 52 patients ranging from mild to severe UC. Significant improvements in inflammatory biomarkers were observed across all treatment groups, with biochemical response (reduction in faecal calprotectin (FCP)) achieved in 21/22 upadacitinib-treated patients, 22/24 tofacitinib-treated patients, and 5/6 filgotinib-treated patients. High-grade biochemical response (≥75% FCP reduction or normalization) was most frequently observed with upadacitinib (86.4%; N=19), followed by tofacitinib (62.5%; N=15) and filgotinib (50%; N=3). Endoscopic reassessment was available in a subset of patients, and the majority showed improvement or resolution of endoscopic inflammation, particularly in the upadacitinib and tofacitinib groups. The safety profile was consistent with recognized JAK inhibitor side effects, with hyperlipidemia being the most common adverse event and intermittent cytopenias noted in some patients; no serious opportunistic infections or thromboembolic events were recorded. These findings suggest that all three JAK inhibitors are effective therapeutic options in real-world practice, with upadacitinib demonstrating the strongest overall biochemical response among this treatment-experienced UC cohort. Larger prospective studies are warranted to confirm the long-term efficacy of these agents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.