ArticleCJC open2026
Testing for Coronary Artery Disease in Patients Newly Diagnosed with Heart Failure in Alberta, Canada.
Article in CJC open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Early identification of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients newly diagnosed with heart failure (HF) has prognostic and therapeutic implications. We evaluated frequency and predictors of CAD testing in Alberta between April 1, 2004 and March 31, 2023. Methods: Population-level retrospective cohort study using linked administrative health datasets and previously validated case definitions. Results: Of 166,447 adults with newly diagnosed HF, 64.2% first presented in the outpatient setting. Within the first month of diagnosis, patients were most likely to be seen by a primary care physician only (PCP, 41.8%); co-management with PCP and a specialist was the second most common management strategy (31.6%). Within 6-months of diagnosis, 46,143 (27.7%) patients had at least one diagnostic evaluation for CAD; coronary catheterization was more common in patients diagnosed in hospital while non-invasive imaging was more common in non-hospitalized patients. Testing was strongly associated with specialist involvement: 54.4% if co-managed with PCP [aOR 5.19, 95% confidence interval 4.96-5.43], 39.6% if saw specialist alone [aOR 2.86, 2.75- 2.97], and 13.8% if managed by PCP alone [referent]). Although frequency of echocardiography and CAD non-invasive imaging rose sharply in 2017, the majority of patients with new HF in all years were not tested for CAD. Conclusion: Despite its prognostic importance, CAD testing is performed in a minority of patients with newly diagnosed heart failure and is heavily influenced by specialist involvement. Optimizing CAD testing patterns for all patients newly diagnosed with HF should be a priority for clinicians and policy makers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.