ArticleJSES reviews, reports, and techniques2026
Clinical outcomes of coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus associated with olecranon fractures.
Article in JSES reviews, reports, and techniques, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Fragment-specific fixation for Dubberley type 3B distal humeral coronal shear fractures using headless compression screws and 2.0-mm micro-locking plates.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Coronal shear fracture (CSF) of the distal humerus is rare, accounting for approximately 1% of elbow fractures; cases combined with olecranon fracture are even rarer. This study aimed to clarify the relationship between surgical methods and clinical outcomes in this uncommon injury. Methods: Between 2017 and 2025, we retrospectively reviewed 8 patients (8 elbows) with CSF associated with olecranon fracture who underwent open reduction and internal fixation in a multicenter case series and were followed for more than 6 months. Patient demographics, fracture classifications, surgical methods, postoperative complications, additional surgeries, elbow range of motion, and Mayo Elbow Performance Score at the final follow-up were analyzed descriptively. Results: The mean age was 64 years (range, 51-79 years), and the mean follow-up was 27 months (range, 10-96 months). Dubberley classification was type 2A in 2 cases, type 3A in 2, and type 3B in 4. A posterolateral extended approach was used in 6 patients and a combined lateral-posterior approach in 2. Postoperative complications included elbow release in 2 cases and ulnar neuropathy in 2. At final follow-up, the mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 92.5 (range, 75-100), and the mean range of motion was -21°/121.3°. Conclusion: Outcomes of CSF with concomitant olecranon fracture appeared to depend on CSF severity, and complications were more frequent than in isolated CSF. Given the small sample size and observational design, these findings should be regarded as preliminary and hypothesis-generating rather than definitive evidence favoring any particular method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.